The Case for Drupal

If you are planning a non-trivial website, this twenty-five minute presentation by Paul Albert, Digital Services Librarian at Weill Cornell Medical Library which compares Drupal, a free Web Content Management System and Application Framework, to FatWire, a proprietary Web CMS, should be required viewing.

Many of the arguments presented here in favour of Drupal also apply to any of a number of popular free systems, and most of the arguments against FatWire apply to any proprietary system. In this case the systems were evaluated for their suitability for use by a Medical Academic Library, but any situation where management of a great deal of information via the Web is required might be considered broadly comparable. The staff at Weill Cornell Medical Library found that:

  • Drupal is and will be cheaper
  • Drupal is robust, extensible, and enterprise ready
  • Other departments in their college are already using Drupal, as are other colleges and libraries, and many are dropping equivalent proprietary systems
  • Drupal supports "perpetual beta" (continuous improvement of a site)
  • Drupal has a much more active support and development community, and "a culture of sharing solutions"
  • Drupal has been paired with other technology in proven ways
  • Drupal has a gentle learning curve (compared to other development environments)

The Case for Drupal-- Why the Open Source CMS is Well-Suited for a Medical Academic Library from Paul Albert on Vimeo.