Five minutes into the last computer club meeting, I was in the process of showing somebody a website distributing some software for running a library, and found myself instead showing them a web page telling us that we weren't permitted to access this site because it was in the blocked category of "freeware/software downloads".
Max said that he'd earlier had a similar problem while trying to show somebody an auction site. I tested this out and sure enough eBay, et. al. were similarly inaccesible because they fall in the blocked category of "auction sites".
The club has installed web content filtering "censorware" on the gateway between it's local network and the outside world. As a club member, I'm appalled by this for a number of reasons:
- censorware doesn't work to significantly reduce IT security risks
- censorware is an attack on freedom of thought and expression, and is morally wrong, regardless of how well it does or doesn't work
Of course this makes running a computer club from within the club's network practically impossible. Or rather it would if circumventing the censorware hadn't been ten minutes work.
In principle however, it is outrageous that an organisation with a commmunity service mission should opt to control the behaviour of it's members and staff using techniques favoured by brutal dictatorships.
In the first part of this article, which I stress reflects my own personal opinions and not those of the Coffs Ex-Services Computer Club as a whole, I will go into detail about how and why censorware doesn't work as a solution to percieved IT security problems that arise from unrestricted access to the Web.
In future posts, I shall examine the ineffectiveness of censorship as a solution to low employee productivity, why it shouldn't be used even if it was effective, and outline a few of the multitude of trivially easy censorware circumvention techniques.




